-
Jean byroot Boussier authored
[Bug #20585] This was changed in 36a06efdd9f0604093dccbaf96d4e2cb17874dc8 because `String.new(1024)` would end up allocating `1025` bytes, but the problem with this change is that the caller may be trying to right size a String. So instead, we should just better document the behavior of `capacity:`. Co-authored-by:
Jean Boussier <jean.boussier@gmail.com>
Jean byroot Boussier authored[Bug #20585] This was changed in 36a06efdd9f0604093dccbaf96d4e2cb17874dc8 because `String.new(1024)` would end up allocating `1025` bytes, but the problem with this change is that the caller may be trying to right size a String. So instead, we should just better document the behavior of `capacity:`. Co-authored-by:
Jean Boussier <jean.boussier@gmail.com>
Loading