-
Stan Lo authored
(https://github.com/ruby/rdoc/pull/1114) It's hard to distinguish code object classes by their file names alone. And given that we have 18 such classes, it'd make the codebase a lot easier to understand if we grouped them into a single directory. Given that these classes are all autoloaded in `lib/rdoc.rb` instead of required individually, this change should have minimum impact on projects using RDoc as they generally just require `rdoc`, not individual files. An example is Rails' `sdoc`: https://github.com/rails/sdoc/blob/main/lib/sdoc/rdoc_monkey_patches.rb https://github.com/ruby/rdoc/commit/4211292ffe
Stan Lo authored(https://github.com/ruby/rdoc/pull/1114) It's hard to distinguish code object classes by their file names alone. And given that we have 18 such classes, it'd make the codebase a lot easier to understand if we grouped them into a single directory. Given that these classes are all autoloaded in `lib/rdoc.rb` instead of required individually, this change should have minimum impact on projects using RDoc as they generally just require `rdoc`, not individual files. An example is Rails' `sdoc`: https://github.com/rails/sdoc/blob/main/lib/sdoc/rdoc_monkey_patches.rb https://github.com/ruby/rdoc/commit/4211292ffe
Loading