-
Yusuke Endoh authored
... instead of any StandardError. To behave like the standard `rm` command, it should only ignore exceptions about not existing files, not every exception. This should make debugging some errors easier, because the expectation is that `rm -rf` will succeed if and only if, all given files (previously existent or not) are removed. However, due to this exception swallowing, this is not always the case. From the `rm` man page > COMPATIBILITY > > The rm utility differs from historical implementations in that the -f > option only masks attempts to remove non-existent files instead of > masking a large variety of errors. https://github.com/ruby/fileutils/commit/fa65d676ec Co-Authored-By:
David Rodríguez <deivid.rodriguez@riseup.net>
Yusuke Endoh authored... instead of any StandardError. To behave like the standard `rm` command, it should only ignore exceptions about not existing files, not every exception. This should make debugging some errors easier, because the expectation is that `rm -rf` will succeed if and only if, all given files (previously existent or not) are removed. However, due to this exception swallowing, this is not always the case. From the `rm` man page > COMPATIBILITY > > The rm utility differs from historical implementations in that the -f > option only masks attempts to remove non-existent files instead of > masking a large variety of errors. https://github.com/ruby/fileutils/commit/fa65d676ec Co-Authored-By:
Loading