-
Ryuta Kamizono authored
Related to #39495. For now, `read_attribute`, `write_attribute`, `[]`, `[]=` are aware of attribute aliases, but `has_attribute?` is not. It will easily miss attribute alias resolution before using `has_attribute?`, it is very inconvenient. I think the inconvenience is not intended, so `has_attribute?` should be aware of attribute aliases like as others for consistency.
Ryuta Kamizono authoredRelated to #39495. For now, `read_attribute`, `write_attribute`, `[]`, `[]=` are aware of attribute aliases, but `has_attribute?` is not. It will easily miss attribute alias resolution before using `has_attribute?`, it is very inconvenient. I think the inconvenience is not intended, so `has_attribute?` should be aware of attribute aliases like as others for consistency.
Loading